Ethics - work & other
Jan. 13th, 2010 09:12 amThis post on "What Is a Good Work Ethic?" at Web Worker Daily struck a chord.
Somewhere along the way it had slipped my mind that what I do is called 'having a work ethic'. That's generally considered a good thing and I shouldn't beat myself up over it. Or want to beat other people up over the lack of it.
Although how do you 'lack' an ethic? It's a sort of moral code, even if you don't think about it it's there one way or another. Even if you do think about it the result might be 'it's fine for me to slack off'. It's funny how 'good' is the default state when people talk about someone having a work ethic. A bad work ethic is considered synonymous with 'no work ethic'.
And why don't we extend this to the flip side? You never hear that someone has a 'good relaxation ethic'. How about a strong family ethic? A dedicated service ethic? Yet surely the same principles apply.
Viewed like this I can say that the first and last both cause trouble for me, having too few and possibly too much respectively. Although what sort of quantifiers do you use? (I'm sure philosophers/sociologists have entire lexicons devoted to this.)
I’ve been complimented by several people recently about my work ethic, and while I appreciate those compliments, I’m still trying to figure out whether that work ethic is a blessing or a curse.
Somewhere along the way it had slipped my mind that what I do is called 'having a work ethic'. That's generally considered a good thing and I shouldn't beat myself up over it. Or want to beat other people up over the lack of it.
Although how do you 'lack' an ethic? It's a sort of moral code, even if you don't think about it it's there one way or another. Even if you do think about it the result might be 'it's fine for me to slack off'. It's funny how 'good' is the default state when people talk about someone having a work ethic. A bad work ethic is considered synonymous with 'no work ethic'.
And why don't we extend this to the flip side? You never hear that someone has a 'good relaxation ethic'. How about a strong family ethic? A dedicated service ethic? Yet surely the same principles apply.
Viewed like this I can say that the first and last both cause trouble for me, having too few and possibly too much respectively. Although what sort of quantifiers do you use? (I'm sure philosophers/sociologists have entire lexicons devoted to this.)